Siges work well in all of them and the battelfields are a joy to see when you deploy and await battle I think Fall Of The Samurai acctuly was the best one since I no longer needed to have hordes of dudes running at each other with swords, musket fire works much better and quiker.īut to be fair all Shogun 2 expansions was and still is very, very good. All the yellow (I was Oda) and black figures swarming into the castle was pretty awesome. There was nothing better than a co- op siege assault when me and this guy had two full stacks. I also thought the campaign was a lot easy and flowed smoother with two clans working together and this made it a lot more fun for me. Plus, the battles are so beautiful and detailed with all the individual fighters that its actually okay to just sit and watch somebody else fight. But on vanilla Shogun they really pulled off having a relatively quick paced campaign with a simple tech and development tree plus few armies so that you can rumble quickly through the turns. In Napoleon and even Fall of the Samurai it felt really slow and clunky didn't really mesh. Totalwar1402 wrote: Honestly I'am struck by how good it was. Not wait twenty turns before you can actually upgrade one of your farms and even longer to cobble together the money of which there is patheticlly little to fund your armies. In other TW games it felt rewarding to slog through developing your settlements. Doesn't work in single player and seems unneccesarry. I do think that dumming the campaign mode down.
0 kommentar(er)
